On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I think we could decide by now what to do with the remaining 34 @xfail > tests of ctypes. It seems nobody noticed that we don't really > implement the full CPython-2.7-compatible ctypes. (As far as I'm > concerned, it adds "features" mostly in the form of more and more > obscure special cases.) So what do you say about being fine with the > current 2.5-compatible situation and silencing the failure on > buildbot? > > http://buildbot.pypy.org/summary/longrepr?testname=unmodified&builder=pypy-c-jit-linux-x86-32&build=1159&mod=lib-python.2.7.test.test_ctypes > > (Note that there are two failures in the link above. We never noticed > when a second failure appeared in addition to the classical xfail one. > If anything, it shows that the current situation is bogus.) > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Hi There are multiple bug reports about missing features in ctypes. Can you look if they're relevant to failures or not? Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
