On 12/14/2011 01:27 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Fijal, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:16, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are multiple bug reports about missing features in ctypes. Can >> you look if they're relevant to failures or not? > > Good point. Some of them are. Still, wouldn't it be better to hide > the failure? It doesn't prevent us from actually taking in bug > reports and fixing them. It's mostly a point of internal workflow: > this is a failure that will likely always remain, because I bet we'll > never get around to fix all 34 obscure cases (and it hides regressions).
I think I am the one to be biased for the current situation :-). I agree with Armin that the current situation is "good enough", and that we should fix/modify ctypes only if someone actually reports an issue. +1 for killing/skipping the xfailing tests. ciao, Anto _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
