Hi Robert, On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Robert Zaremba <robert.zare...@zoho.com> wrote: > Whats the problem with cppyy? > Why don't extend it rather than build new solution based on pycparser?
Once again the design goals are different. Note that the first mail in this thread was 15 days ago. During this time we got a working prototype. I'm sure that it would have taken us 15 days too to even figure out how to correctly interface with cppyy, not to mention that it requires a C++ compiler and --- as far as I know --- cannot handle some of the most C-specific ways headers are written, like (ab)uses of macros. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
