Hi, On 29 January 2018 at 11:22, Tin Tvrtković <tinches...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's just that doing it this way is unconventional and a little scary. Would > we be violating a Python rule somewhere and making stuff blow up later if we > went this way?
No, it's semantically fine. But it comes with a heavy penalty on PyPy. I guess you don't see it because you measured something tiny, like creating the instance and then throwing it away---the JIT optimizes that to nothing at all in both cases. Not only is the creation time larger, but attribute access is slower, and the memory usage is larger. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
