Thanks a lot, Armin. If we go this way, it's easy to special case PyPy. On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:42 PM Armin Rigo <armin.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 29 January 2018 at 11:22, Tin Tvrtković <tinches...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's just that doing it this way is unconventional and a little scary. > Would > > we be violating a Python rule somewhere and making stuff blow up later > if we > > went this way? > > No, it's semantically fine. But it comes with a heavy penalty on > PyPy. I guess you don't see it because you measured something tiny, > like creating the instance and then throwing it away---the JIT > optimizes that to nothing at all in both cases. Not only is the > creation time larger, but attribute access is slower, and the memory > usage is larger. > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
