On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:17, David Boddie wrote: > I think that there are two groups of people who expect different things, > and QString is possibly controversial to many people because it's peculiar > to see a class that duplicates the functionality of a built-in type. > However, I think that there's an advantage in being able to write code in > Python that resembles what you would write in C++. This applies to other > classes that would appear to duplicate Python built-in types.
Being a newb here, I could be way off base, but one of the selling points I keep reading for using PyQt and PyKDE are for rapid prototyping apps that later get converted to C++. Would getting rid of QStrings not impose a greater conversion burden on these people and thus alienate them? And what would the downstream effect on PyKDE be? John. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
