On 2009-10-27, Matti Airas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What's your opinion - should PyQt's new-style signals and slots [1] be
> adopted in PySide as-is? I find the syntax actually clear, nice, and
> Pythonic. Unless we can come up with something drastically better, maybe
> it would be just simplest to maintain compatibility and take the syntax
> as-is?

I really hope you maintain compatibility as long as possible (ideally
forever;-)

That will make it easy for users to migrate between the two
implementations and will reduce the learning curve. It will also make it
easier to document PySide (and easier for authors;-)

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> ma.
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/static/Docs/PyQt4/pyqt4ref.html#new-
sty
> le-signal-and-slot-support _______________________________________________
> PySide mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
> 


-- 
Mark Summerfield, Qtrac Ltd, www.qtrac.eu
    C++, Python, Qt, PyQt - training and consultancy
        "Advanced Qt Programming" - ISBN 0321635906
_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside

Reply via email to