On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:36:24 Matti Airas wrote: > Hi, > > What's your opinion - should PyQt's new-style signals and slots [1] be > adopted in PySide as-is? I find the syntax actually clear, nice, and > Pythonic. Unless we can come up with something drastically better, maybe > it would be just simplest to maintain compatibility and take the syntax > as-is?
I like the PyQt new-style signal slots syntax. Reinventing it will just add another imcompatibility and, I believe, no improvments, because the new syntax is good enough. But keep the old syntax and the new one working together in the same code base just add pain to us (developers), hehehe Btw the old syntax mimics the C++ syntax, and the C++ syntax is this way just due to C++ limitations, not because it's a beautifull syntax. > Cheers, > > ma. > > > [1] > http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/static/Docs/PyQt4/pyqt4ref.html#new-sty > le-signal-and-slot-support _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
