Here is a question along the lines of reg reg's comment: In the future will Shiboken build without *any* boost dependancies, or will it just avoid using Boost::Python? For example: will the Boost Graph Lib always be required to build the API Extractor? I apologize if I overlooked an obvious answer somewhere - but I would love to know the answer.
Thanks! -Cyrus On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:17 PM, reg reg <[email protected]> wrote: > What he said. > I'm the main(only) dev of Gereqi and i'd like to move away from PyQt4, but > until Boost dep's are gone I don't wan't to commit. > To me, fixing pyside+boost bugs are of no importance to me. > Thought i'd chip-in to this quiet mailing-list. > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > have them dealt with in the Shiboken implementation. This is of course a >> > pain for developers working with PySide as the bugs won't be fixed soon; >> > maybe it would help if we early next sprint made Ubuntu debs for the >> > then-available Shiboken-made modules (just QtCore and QtGui) to give >> > developers access to the new stuff as soon as possible? >> >> As I see it, nobody is depending on pyside at the moment - people are >> basically evaluating its suitability as pyqt replacement. Since >> evaluations against the soon-to-be-extinct boost version are >> worthless, I don't see the point in fixing the boost version. People >> can fall back on pyqt until shiboken is production ready. >> >> -- >> Ville M. Vainio >> http://tinyurl.com/vainio >> _______________________________________________ >> PySide mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
