On Sunday 31 January 2010 15:37:34 Cyrus Harrison wrote: > Here is a question along the lines of reg reg's comment: > > In the future will Shiboken build without *any* boost dependancies, or > will it just avoid using Boost::Python? > For example: will the Boost Graph Lib always be required to build the > API Extractor?
Until now, no. We need the topological sort function in boost::graph, so until one of us write a fast and well tested topological sort function we can't avoid the boost::graph dependence. Years ago I implemented one, it's well tested, because I did it for an online programming contest and it passed all tests. I just need to do minor changes on my code to use it on APIExtractor and Shiboken generator and drop another dependence. I implemented it for the following problem: http://uva.onlinejudge.org/index.php?option=com_onlinejudge&Itemid=8&category=15&page=show_problem&problem=1246 Here's the code: http://pastebin.com/m1b352aed > I apologize if I overlooked an obvious answer somewhere - but I would > love to know the answer. > > Thanks! > > -Cyrus > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:17 PM, reg reg <[email protected]> wrote: > > What he said. > > I'm the main(only) dev of Gereqi and i'd like to move away from PyQt4, > > but until Boost dep's are gone I don't wan't to commit. > > To me, fixing pyside+boost bugs are of no importance to me. > > Thought i'd chip-in to this quiet mailing-list. > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > have them dealt with in the Shiboken implementation. This is of course > >> > a pain for developers working with PySide as the bugs won't be fixed > >> > soon; maybe it would help if we early next sprint made Ubuntu debs for > >> > the then-available Shiboken-made modules (just QtCore and QtGui) to > >> > give developers access to the new stuff as soon as possible? > >> > >> As I see it, nobody is depending on pyside at the moment - people are > >> basically evaluating its suitability as pyqt replacement. Since > >> evaluations against the soon-to-be-extinct boost version are > >> worthless, I don't see the point in fixing the boost version. People > >> can fall back on pyqt until shiboken is production ready. > >> > >> -- > >> Ville M. Vainio > >> http://tinyurl.com/vainio > >> _______________________________________________ > >> PySide mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PySide mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > -- Hugo Parente Lima "Precisamos de mais gênios humildes no mundo, hoje somos poucos!" JID: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
