On Tuesday 20 April 2010 22:39:04 Luciano Wolf wrote:
> Today we published[1] some numbers about PySide-Shiboken load time and
> disk size usage. Now we are slimmer than PySide-Boost and just a
> little bit behind PyQt4 (QtCore: 2.2MiB x 2.2MiB and QtGui: 8.3MiB x
> 6.8MiB). These sizes were achieved without optimizations into the
> PySide-Shiboken source code. As we move ahead with bugfixing tasks new
> benchmarks will be produced.

Just out of curiousity, can you tell/note which version of Qt and PyQt you're 
basing the comparison on (and if the size comparison is X86, ARM - thumb/no 
thumb or) ? I suppose on the N900 you used the 4.7.x (with the 
protected-as-public hack) I pushed to extras, but just for the sake of 
completeness - noting versions, platforms (and methodologies) in benchmarks 
is never a bad thing :)


Regards,
Attila

_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside

Reply via email to