It was really too informal  :)

This PySide-Shiboken was compiled against Qt 4.6.2 and compared with
PyQt4 4.7.2 [Ubuntu - 64bits]. To do the N900 test we used your 4.7
version. A more detailed report will be produced as we release a new
version of PySide-Shiboken in a couple of weeks.

Regards,
Luciano

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 21.04.2010 13:44, ext Attila Csipa wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiousity, can you tell/note which version of Qt and PyQt
>> you're
>> basing the comparison on (and if the size comparison is X86, ARM -
>> thumb/no
>> thumb or) ? I suppose on the N900 you used the 4.7.x (with the
>> protected-as-public hack) I pushed to extras, but just for the sake of
>> completeness - noting versions, platforms (and methodologies) in
>> benchmarks
>> is never a bad thing :)
>
> I'd be interested too. :-)
>
> There's a national holiday in Brazil today so we might have to wait until
> tomorrow, though...
>
> ma.
> _______________________________________________
> PySide mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
>
_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside

Reply via email to