On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Attila Csipa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 22:08:14 Luciano Wolf wrote: > > After this last PySide release we spent some time doing benchmarks to > > see how far we have gone with Shiboken (the CPython implementation). > > The results are very good when comparing disk usage and performance > > with that old Boost version. At the same time this report shows some > > points where we can improve and do better, like the "disconnect > > signals" implementation. Until now just common techniques were applied > > to improve performance. So, have a good reading! > > Kudos to everyone involved ! The numbers show that PySide has really come a > long way and I'm certain that it will continue to improve in the future ! > One > question about the versions though, were you using a custom build of Qt or > perhaps the mythical PR1.2 (instead of the listed 3.2010.02-8) ? Asking > this > as you list a newer Qt version that is not present in extras-devel and the > PySide & PyQt4 versions listed are not actually installable on 3.2010.02-8, > either ;) > > Regards, > Attila > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > I'm not sure if this can answer your question, but I'm using PySide in my scratchbox env with latest SDK, which is the closest thing to PR1.2 atm I think. -- Luca Donaggio
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
