On Wednesday 12 May 2010 11:27:58 Luca Donaggio wrote:
> I'm not sure if this can answer your question, but I'm using PySide in my
> scratchbox env with latest SDK, which is the closest thing to PR1.2 atm I
> think.

The page refers to the benchmarks actually being run on an N900 as the desktop 
versions were too quick for measuring meaningful differences. All this is just 
nitpicking really, I'm pretty sure PR1.1.1 vs PR1.2 would make no impact on 
the general conclusion of the benchmark. I was curious about the versions 
since so far I did not manage to do a proper PyQt4+Qt4.6 benchmark or play 
with different optimizations due to that PR1.2 issue (BTW the latest currently 
public available SDK is 10.2010.09-3 and IIRC contains an older version of Qt 
than the one listed in the benchmark, so I would guess the actual firmware in 
the test used *was* a newer firmware build than indicated - not that it matters 
that much, as I already said). 

Regards,
Attila

_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside

Reply via email to