for me its OK.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > I now updated the draft according to Hugo's proposal. Please check the new > draft whether I've fumbled with anything. > > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0100.html > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pseps/commit/dc11c2ea8ef89b4ec42b3ab6dd24c2fe4e52b06c > > If there are no issues or no considerations, I'd like to have this accepted > ASAP so that the implementation (which is already in Gitorious) can be > modified accordingly before the next release. > > Thanks, > > ma. > > > On 24.05.2010 14:35, Airas Matti.P (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: >> >> (Sorry for not replying earlier, I've been terribly busy for the last >> few days.) >> >> On 21.05.2010 14:05, ext Mark Summerfield wrote: >>> >>> On 2010-05-20, Hugo Parente Lima wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Just a RFC about naming issues in PSEP100. >>>> >>>> To create a signal we use a class called "signal", it's a class, not a >>>> function, this raises the following some issue: >>>> >>>> - If it's a class, why the name starts with lower case character? >>>> >>>> My request if to change "signal" to "Signal" and "slot" to Slot" to >>>> respect >>>> the PySide and Qt naming style rules. >>>> >>>> We also need to change the PSEP100 text everywhere when "function" was >>>> mentioned. >>>> >>>> What you think? If we gonna do this, better do it before the next >>>> release. >>> >>> >>> Looks like a good change to me. >> >> To me too. Even though PyQt apparently uses factory functions for >> pyqtSignal and pyqtSlot, the functionality definitely passes the Duck >> Test for classes: it walks like a class and quacks like a class, so it >> should be named like a class to cause the least amount of confusion for >> the users. >> >> As an administrative matter, the PSEP has already been accepted, so >> according to PSEP 1 flowcharts [1], the PSEP should be rejected and then >> a new one made to replace it. Since that feels quite bureaucratic and >> silly, I suppose no-one objects if I just drop the document to DRAFT >> status and have it re-accepted with the same number. >> >> [1] http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0001.html >> >> Cheers, >> >> ma. >> _______________________________________________ >> PySide mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside > -- Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Mobile: +55 (81) 8704-2144 _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
