Qt is available under three different licenses: Commercial, LGPL and GPL http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing But I think LGPL is the one developers generally would use.
<I am not a lawyer - on> Matti probably suggested BSD, as that is a very permissive license (even LGPL requires you to submit back your modifications, BSD does not and it also allows you to use the code any way you want) <IANAL - off> Hartti On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Algis Kabaila <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matti, > > Are GNU Library General Public Licenses (LGPL) acceptable > licences for contributions to PySide? (You have suggested BSD > type licences recently). AFAIK Qt was licenced under LGPL. Is > that still the case? > > Licences can cause endless and occasionally passionate > discussions, whilst all legal finess is generally lost on > "passionate programmers", so I apologise for raising this > question on Christmas eve... > > OldAl. > > -- > Algis > http://akabaila.pcug.org.au > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside >
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
