If we can get easy access to static web area hosted by Qt Project Foundation, I think that would be much preferable solution.
I'm thinking of having a link to PySide documentation at http://qt-project.org/doc/. :-) ma. On 28 September 2012 16:46, Srini Kommoori <[email protected]> wrote: > pyside.org redirect to wiki page is online. I have updated wiki with a > docs link. > > Hugo, Is it possible to host static documentation pages on github > pyside account? I will send a pull request. > > thanks, > -Srini > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Srini Kommoori <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. I contacted local Digia folks(Tuukka Ahoniemi) and they sent our > > domain and vpc requests to concerned folks. Hope we will hear > > something back from them today. > > > > On the technical side of things, I just checked search also on the > > docs, there is no dependency on a server as they are all static pages > > and javascript is doing the search. > > http://srinikom.github.com/pyside-docs/ > > > > So we could host docs on github without depending on anyone. All we > > need is domain whois info access Or someone willing to modify domain > > settings for us. > > > > 2. I can easily create a blogger site+blog with the same theme and we > > all can collaborate and publish updates. > > > > 3. I volunteer to take up the hosting tasks going forward completely. > > It would be good to know how is the project structured? Who posts > > binaries? I think on the coding and checkin side, our git repository > > is taken care right now - do we need any help on that? > > > > Matti, Am I missing any hosting tasks? > > > > thanks, > > -Srini > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Stephan, > >> > >> On 28 September 2012 15:07, Stephan Deibel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Matti Airas wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> I'm almost 100% certain that the PSF hosting some resources for PySide > >>> won't come with a requirement about licensing or process for PySide. > Or at > >>> least that's my impression from having been on the PSF board some > years ago, > >>> and from everything I've observed since. It certainly is true that a > >>> contributor agreement is needed for anything in Python itself and the > Python > >>> standard library, but PySide would not go into the Python standard > library. > >> > >> > >> I was discussing the issue with some PSF board members back in August > 2011, > >> and that was the message then. > >> > >>> > >>> That said, is the problem with Qt Project or a temporary one caused by > the > >>> transfer from Nokia to Digia? > >> > >> > >> It's probably really neither. I think the problem was more due to the > >> overworked Nokia Qt organization having to deliver to an unpublished > closed > >> project, while at the same time having to cater for the open Qt > Project. The > >> open project probably couldn't be sufficiently prioritized - it wasn't > an > >> issue with Qt Project itself, IMHO. Ever an optimist, I actually think > Digia > >> has more interest in Qt Project in general and in PySide too. > >> > >> I got a while ago in contact with Lars Knoll (Qt lead maintainer), and > he > >> wanted to resolve the issue ASAP. Also talked to Tuukka Turunen (Digia > Qt > >> Commercial Director), and he wanted to resolve the issue without delay, > too. > >> So, let's hope for the best. > >> > >>> I don't care too much either way but maybe in the long term being part > of > >>> the Qt Project will be less hassle (if really part of it, and not > easily > >>> orphaned again as seems to have happened now). > >> > >> > >> Me too, with the same condition. :-) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> ma. >
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
