Yea. Hosting on qt-project.org sounds good.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Hugo Parente Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2012 05:01:49 PM Matti Airas wrote: >> If we can get easy access to static web area hosted by Qt Project >> Foundation, I think that would be much preferable solution. > > I agree. > >> I'm thinking of having a link to PySide documentation at >> http://qt-project.org/doc/. :-) > > This would be really nice. > >> ma. >> >> On 28 September 2012 16:46, Srini Kommoori <[email protected]> wrote: >> > pyside.org redirect to wiki page is online. I have updated wiki with a >> > docs link. >> > >> > Hugo, Is it possible to host static documentation pages on github >> > pyside account? I will send a pull request. >> > >> > thanks, >> > -Srini >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Srini Kommoori <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > 1. I contacted local Digia folks(Tuukka Ahoniemi) and they sent our >> > > domain and vpc requests to concerned folks. Hope we will hear >> > > something back from them today. >> > > >> > > On the technical side of things, I just checked search also on the >> > > docs, there is no dependency on a server as they are all static pages >> > > and javascript is doing the search. >> > > http://srinikom.github.com/pyside-docs/ >> > > >> > > So we could host docs on github without depending on anyone. All we >> > > need is domain whois info access Or someone willing to modify domain >> > > settings for us. >> > > >> > > 2. I can easily create a blogger site+blog with the same theme and we >> > > all can collaborate and publish updates. >> > > >> > > 3. I volunteer to take up the hosting tasks going forward completely. >> > > It would be good to know how is the project structured? Who posts >> > > binaries? I think on the coding and checkin side, our git repository >> > > is taken care right now - do we need any help on that? >> > > >> > > Matti, Am I missing any hosting tasks? >> > > >> > > thanks, >> > > -Srini >> > > >> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> Hi Stephan, >> > >> >> > >> On 28 September 2012 15:07, Stephan Deibel <[email protected]> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >>> Matti Airas wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> I'm almost 100% certain that the PSF hosting some resources for PySide >> > >>> won't come with a requirement about licensing or process for PySide. >> > >> > Or at >> > >> > >>> least that's my impression from having been on the PSF board some >> > >> > years ago, >> > >> > >>> and from everything I've observed since. It certainly is true that a >> > >>> contributor agreement is needed for anything in Python itself and the >> > >> > Python >> > >> > >>> standard library, but PySide would not go into the Python standard >> > >> > library. >> > >> > >> I was discussing the issue with some PSF board members back in August >> > >> > 2011, >> > >> > >> and that was the message then. >> > >> >> > >>> That said, is the problem with Qt Project or a temporary one caused by >> > >> > the >> > >> > >>> transfer from Nokia to Digia? >> > >> >> > >> It's probably really neither. I think the problem was more due to the >> > >> overworked Nokia Qt organization having to deliver to an unpublished >> > >> > closed >> > >> > >> project, while at the same time having to cater for the open Qt >> > >> > Project. The >> > >> > >> open project probably couldn't be sufficiently prioritized - it wasn't >> > >> > an >> > >> > >> issue with Qt Project itself, IMHO. Ever an optimist, I actually think >> > >> > Digia >> > >> > >> has more interest in Qt Project in general and in PySide too. >> > >> >> > >> I got a while ago in contact with Lars Knoll (Qt lead maintainer), and >> > >> > he >> > >> > >> wanted to resolve the issue ASAP. Also talked to Tuukka Turunen (Digia >> > >> > Qt >> > >> > >> Commercial Director), and he wanted to resolve the issue without delay, >> > >> > too. >> > >> > >> So, let's hope for the best. >> > >> >> > >>> I don't care too much either way but maybe in the long term being part >> > >> > of >> > >> > >>> the Qt Project will be less hassle (if really part of it, and not >> > >> > easily >> > >> > >>> orphaned again as seems to have happened now). >> > >> >> > >> Me too, with the same condition. :-) >> > >> >> > >> Cheers, >> > >> >> > >> ma. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
