Tim Peters wrote:
> Let's see. Should I watch a movie now, or search pre-string-method
> archives for quotes nobody really cares about? While I think about
> that ;-), you could look in _this_ thread for:
well, designing things based on how old farts think things where back
in the old days isn't really optimal. and as we've seen on python-dev,
there's nothing that old python farts do better than arguing for keeping
the status quo, no matter what that is...
> While I don't know for sure, I always assumed that was the true source
> of most of the relevant "how come my code doesn't work?!" complaints
> on comp.lang.python before string methods were introduced.
for the record, this just appeared on comp.lang.python:
hello everyone! I can't seem to find a function that combines a list of
items into a string with a seperator between the individual elements..
which, based on the law of design based on random sampling of c.l.python,
indicates that the current situation is not optimal.
</F>
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com