On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:51:29 PST, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> this appears to be a worrysome trend away from duck typing > >Duck typing is a seriously bad idea, forced on Python by the now >obsolete split between built-in types and user-defined types.
Wow. Just wow. Anyway, the proposal was in no way suggesting moving away from duck typing. The new iter was to be a _wrapper_ around any existing iterator, not a base class for iterators. Jean-Paul _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
