At 03:19 PM 11/22/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I consider it a waste of time since the if-version works and there's >no reason for it to be extensible.
But if that's true, then there's no reason for it to use interfaces, either, is there? :) It seems like a double standard to say, "well, sometimes you have quick-and-dirty code that doesn't need extensibility", and then later complain that it should be able to check for an interface, instead of using either a concrete type or an overload or generic. That is, I don't think you can use the quick'n'dirty case simultaneously as an argument against overloads and *for* interfaces. :) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
