+1 on removing implicit str calls from join altogether.
On 11/2/07, Adam Hupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The alternative is to uniformly apply str(), which for bytes returns a > string of the form > > "b'...'" or "buffer(b'...')" (depending on whether the bytes are > > immutable or not). Given that we killed the exception for "" == b"" > > earlier, I'm tempted to remove the exception. Any opinions to the > > contrary? > > +1 on removing bytes-specific behavior from join. Whatever the > behavior is it should be consistent. > > I prefer removing the str call on .join entirely. Is there any other > string method that implicitly str's it's argument? I can't think of > any. If this works I would expect that concatenation also implicitly > converts (ala java). > > > -- > Adam Hupp | http://hupp.org/adam/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/shiblon%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
