On 11/3/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: > > From a purity standpoint, I agree with removing the implicit > > str'ing. I'm just sure what is more practical. > > If it's really considered worth providing this extra > convenience, how about a different method for it: > > "".joinstr(...) > > Just as convenient, and explicit rather than implicit, > so it won't cause any surprises.
Convenience of that over either of these:: ''.join(map(str, args)) ''.join(str(x) for x in args) is just not worth tacking on another method to str in my opinion. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
