Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
I think there's a problem here:
+ self->data = realloc(self->data, self->size * sizeof(PyObject *));
+ if (self->data == NULL)
goto nomemory;
If realloc() fails, the old data pointer is lost and therefore will never get
free()ed.
Same for:
+ self->buf = (char *)realloc(self->buf, self->buf_size);
Here:
- int *marks;
- s=self->marks_size+20;
- if (s <= self->num_marks) s=self->num_marks + 1;
+ size_t alloc;
+ Py_ssize_t *marks;
+
+ /* Use the size_t type to check for overflow. */
+ alloc = ((size_t)self->num_marks << 1) + 20;
It seems you are changing the overallocation algorithm (from additive to
multiplicative). I'm not sure it should be in the scope of the patch, although
multiplicative overallocation is generally better.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13555>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
