STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > It's clutter and we should show some restraint before adding new types.
dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type. We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. Or it may be exposed in a module like collections. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14386> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
