Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment: [haypo] > dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type.
+1 > We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. +1 > Or it may be exposed in a module like collections. Please don't use collections as a dumping ground for this sort of thing. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14386> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
