Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> added the comment: > Previously existing redundant functions could be > deprecated in documentation.
As in, don't start a "deprecation cycle" (warning in 3.3, deprecated in 3.4, gone in 3.5), just document "consider using this other function instead"? That's probably worth doing. I wouldn't use the word "deprecated" though, I'd just suggest a "see also". Maybe we could remove the redundant functions in 4.0. I'll put it on my wishlist :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14626> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
