Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210 > Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a > :exc:`NotImplementedError`. > Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks > is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't > support symlinks at all?
And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it be NotImplementedError? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14626> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
