Alexandre Vassalotti added the comment:
Serhiy, I am not able to reproduce your results. I don't get any significant
performance improvements with your patch.
22:34:03 [ ~/PythonDev/cpython-baseline ]$ ./python.exe -m timeit "import
pickle" "with open('test.pickle4', 'rb', buffering=0) as f: pickle.load(f)"
100 loops, best of 3: 9.26 msec per loop
22:36:13 [ ~/PythonDev/cpython ]$ ./python.exe -m timeit "import pickle" "with
open('test.pickle4', 'rb', buffering=0) as f: pickle.load(f)"
100 loops, best of 3: 9.28 msec per loop
I wrote a benchmark to simulate slow reads. But again, there is no performance
difference with the patch.
22:24:56 [ ~/PythonDev/benchmarks ]$ ./perf.py -v -b unpickle_file
../cpython-baseline/python.exe ../cpython/python.exe
### unpickle_file ###
Min: 1.103715 -> 1.103666: 1.00x faster
Avg: 1.158279 -> 1.146820: 1.01x faster
Not significant
Stddev: 0.04127 -> 0.03273: 1.2608x smaller
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32864/unpickle_file_bench.diff
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19780>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
