Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > 22:36:13 [ ~/PythonDev/cpython ]$ ./python.exe -m timeit "import pickle" > "with open('test.pickle4', 'rb', buffering=0) as f: pickle.load(f)" 100 > loops, best of 3: 9.28 msec per loop
Did you use the same test file or different files (generated by patched and unpatched pickler)? Try to run this command several times and take a minimum. > I wrote a benchmark to simulate slow reads. But again, there is no > performance difference with the patch. Test data are too small, they all less than frame size. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19780> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com