Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: On 16.04.2015 19:14, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > However, for plain .so files that you have on your system (which will > mostly like not support more than 2-4 different architecture configurations > running at the same time), I don't currently see a need to make things > more complicated than necessary. > > Perhaps you can point me to some use cases where the triple > platform tag is really useful.
Antoine's ticket is the first in two decades to request being able to install .so extension files side-by-side, so even if times and platforms change, people don't seem to have a big issues without this feature. If you have a need, it's not really hard to build your extensions for different architecture ABIs in different directories. We've been doing this for years, just like everyone else. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22980> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
