Paul Moore added the comment:

> If there is no interest in having a (community-supported, semi-
> official) GCC-built Python on Windows, I'm sure something else
> can also be worked out, which would include stripping the current
> dinosaur -mno-cygwin code which is what this bug was originally
> all about.

The issue is about building Python *extensions* with gcc, not about building 
Python itself - that's not a supported approach at all (MSYS2 does it, but the 
patches used aren't going to be integrated in core Python).

The problem is that the people who build those extensions (which is not me, nor 
is it anyone on the core Python team) have never settled on a single version of 
the mingw toolchain as "what they want the distutils to support". So each bug 
report or patch is needs different "how to install mingw" instructions to be 
followed before a core developer can work on it.

I'm suggesting that the people raising distutils bugs about mingw support get 
together and agree on a common toolchain that they'll use as a basis for any 
future bugs/patches.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4709>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to