klappnase added the comment:
Hi Serhiy,
thanks for the feedback.
"+ def tk_busy(self, **kw):
Shouldn't it be just an alias to tk_busy_hold?"
Not sure, I figured since it is a separate command in tk I would make it a
separate command in Python, too.
"+ def tk_busy_hold(self, **kw):
Since the only supported option is cursor, just declare it.
def tk_busy_hold(self, cursor=None):
"
I thought so at first, too, but is this really wise, since if future versions
of tk add other options another patch would be required?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28498>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
