Nick Coghlan added the comment: Check the issue history - the issue has been rejected by Raymond, and then reopened for further debate by other core developers multiple times.
That's not a reasonable approach to requesting reconsideration of a module/API maintainers design decision. I acknowledge that those earlier reopenings weren't by you, but the issue should still remain closed until *Raymond* agrees to reconsider it (and given the alternative option of instead making the lower overhead PyStructSequence visible at the Python level, I'd be surprised if he does). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28638> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
