Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment: No, it doesn't match the "@dotted_name(arg_list)" pattern.
decorator: "@" `dotted_name` ["(" [`argument_list` [","]] ")"] NEWLINE call: `primary` "(" [`argument_list` [","] | `comprehension`] ")" argument_list: `positional_arguments` ["," `starred_and_keywords`] : ["," `keywords_arguments`] : | `starred_and_keywords` ["," `keywords_arguments`] : | `keywords_arguments` The call syntax contains a special case for generator expression. The decorator expression syntax dosn't contain it. You should change the grammar rule to decorator: "@" `dotted_name` ["(" [`argument_list` [","] | `comprehension`] ")"] NEWLINE for supporting this syntax. Please open a separate topic on Python-Dev for discussing this language change. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32012> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com