Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> added the comment: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:31:52PM +0000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > If limited to the original scope, this isn't a new special case, it's fixing > a bug in the implementation of the existing special case (where it's ignoring > the trailing comma when it shouldn't be).
This ignores the trailing comma: f([1,2,3],) And this: f(x for x in [1,2,3],) Seems logical to me. Do you want to allow the 1,2 to be read as a tuple? f(x for x in 1,2) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32012> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com