Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 1. The name "topsort" is most naturally parsed as "top sort" which could be > misinterpreted (as a sort that puts items on top in some way). If the name > must be abbreviated then "toposort" would be better. I totally agree that `topsort` is a bad name, I used it more or less as a dummy for starting the discussion about the implementation. > 2. "Topological sort" is a terrible name: the analogy with topological graph > theory is (i) unlikely to be helpful to anyone; and (ii) not quite right. I > know that the name is widely used in computing, but a name incorporating > "linearize" or "linear order" or "total order" would be much clearer. Topological sort (not as the function name) but as an operation is a very well known concept and is well defined. If you are referring to not use "Topological Sort" in the docstrings or the documentation, I strongly oppose. Regarding the interface, I am more happy to change it once there is an agreement. I am still awaiting Raymond's comments regarding this so we can start discussing. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue17005> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
