Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
FTR (not for Serhiy, but for others reading this), here's the previous discussion of the possibility of adding an imath module. https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2018-July/051917.html While I'm happy for this to go in either math or a new imath module, I'm a bit sceptical that at this point we're going to get a useful imath module together in time for 3.8 (and I don't have bandwidth to do the imath work myself). How about we put it in math for now, and if we get around to imath before the 3.8b1, I'm happy to have it move from math to imath? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36887> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com