Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:

FTR (not for Serhiy, but for others reading this), here's the previous 
discussion of the possibility of adding an imath module.

   https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2018-July/051917.html

While I'm happy for this to go in either math or a new imath module, I'm a bit 
sceptical that at this point we're going to get a useful imath module together 
in time for 3.8 (and I don't have bandwidth to do the imath work myself). How 
about we put it in math for now, and if we get around to imath before the 
3.8b1, I'm happy to have it move from math to imath?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36887>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to