Petr Viktorin <[email protected]> added the comment:
> What downsides do we see raising an exception? Yeah, on second thought, that would probably be best. We still want PR #15641 as well, so the exception doesn't actually happen in practice. Note that _PyEval_EvalCodeWithName (the main use of func_globals) already fails with an exception if globals is NULL. > Either we remove tp_clear or somehow we have to protect all callers of the > function. Technically, any field cleared from tp_cleared leaves the function > in an inconsistent state tp_clear has a purpose; it prevents memory leaks. That leaves protecting access to the cleared fields. (But we don't need to clear func_name and func_qualname as these must be strings.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38006> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
