Cournapeau David <da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> added the comment:
@ Mark
Concerning float('inf') * 1j: you're right, my rambling did not make any
sense, sorry.
I agree that adding complexity may be a good reason to warrant an
arbitrary feature; actually, I did not manage to handle nan/inf at first
because of the complexity :) But as I mentioned in a previous comment, I
think my patch simplifies the parsing as well. I suggested to split the
patch in to: one whithout any new feature (no handling of nan/inf), and
then anoter handling nan/inf on the top of it. Would that be acceptable ?
Also, how should I proceed to share implementation between floatobject.c
and complexobject.c ? Would creating a new file for the common code be
acceptable ?
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2121>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
