Xavier Morel <xavier.mo...@masklinn.net> added the comment:
@rhettinger checking software against 3.9 there's a little issue with the way the check is done: if passed something which is *both* a sequence and a set (e.g. an ordered set), `random.sample` will trigger a warning, which I don't think is correct. Should I open a new issue for that? Fix seems simple: just move the check for _Set inside the check for _Sequence, and raise if that doesn't pass either. ---------- nosy: +xmorel _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40325> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
