Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> There's also a somewhat arbitrary choice to be made here: > do we consider NaNs to be negative or positive? > That is, do we want NaNs to sort to the beginning of the > list, or the end? I had suggested putting NaNs at the beginning because that is how None was sorted in Python 2. But that doesn't really need to be a guide. Likely the best choice is to follow numpy's decision, placing NaNs at the end. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44370> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
