Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment:
On 07.10.2021 12:16, Christian Heimes wrote: > >> That's certainly true, but at the same time, just focusing on string > hashes only doesn't really help either, e.g. it is very easy to > create a DoS with numeric keys or other objects which use trivial > hashing algorithms. > > Marc-Andre, Victor, your postings are off-topic. Please move your discussion > to a new BPO. I don't quite follow. Why is it fine that you discuss DoS, but it's not fine when others discuss DoS ? You're statement comes across as an attempt to shut down a possibly fruitful discussion. Not sure if you intended it that way. We could open a new issue to discuss faster alternatives to siphash and then close this one, or simply rename this issue, if it bothers you that we're not strictly focusing on siphash 1-3 :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue29410> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
