Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > With regards to SSL_peek() blocking, you'd need to explain yourself > better on that one. The patch has been tested with the test cases > from Python SVN enough to be happy they run ok.
IIRC it worked with OpenSSL 1.0.0 but failed with 0.9.8k. I could test it again if you think that is unlikely. Can SSL_pending() be used in place of SSL_peek() in this case? (note: there doesn't seem to be any documentation for SSL_peek() on the openssl.org website) > I'll leave you guys too it about how you want to handle things with > python (i.e. to make the design choice trade offs). I think all the > points have been covered. Thanks a lot for your help. I believe it has been fruitful. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8108> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
