Senthil Kumaran <orsent...@gmail.com> added the comment: Committed the tests in the r80908, r80909, r80910 and r80911. The backward incompatible test cases, as in whose parsing requirements have changed since the previous RFC has been commented out. There were 4 abnormal scenarios and one strict parsing requirement (overridden by relaxed parsing requirement use case).
With respect to commented out tests, if we come across parsing behavior in applications relying on it, we can address it then. Thanks Paul and others for tracking this issue. ---------- resolution: accepted -> fixed stage: unit test needed -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: feature request -> behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1462525> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
