Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Yes, I think we have a consensus on this point. Note, however that > since unbound methods have been removed in 3.x, it is not trivial to > find a fully qualified name of a method anymore.
I suppose only bound methods should be pickleable: >>> class C: ... def m(self): pass ... >>> c = C() >>> c.m <bound method C.m of <__main__.C object at 0x7fa81299b150>> >>> c.m.__self__.__module__ '__main__' And perhaps class methods too: >>> class C: ... @classmethod ... def cm(self): pass ... >>> C.cm <bound method type.cm of <class '__main__.C'>> >>> C.cm.__self__ <class '__main__.C'> >>> C.cm.__self__.__module__ '__main__' > Also we need to > decide where to stop: should methods of nested classes be pickleable? As we want, but they needn't be. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9276> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
