Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> added the comment: 2010/12/4 Thomas Vander Stichele <rep...@bugs.python.org>: > > Thomas Vander Stichele <thoma...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: > > Maybe I am missing something, but why was it ok for this patch to move > EXTENDED_ARGS from 143 to 145 ? I thought the numbers for opcodes were part > of the ABI ?
Very much not. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6101> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
