Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Well, I just checked, and from 2.3 to 2.6 opcodes were only added, > existing ones were never renumbered. > > 2.7 however reshuffled a bunch of them, for no apparent reason at all:
LIST_APPEND was renumbered because it gained an argument. There are also new opcodes in this list. Regardless, there is no guarantee about opcode numbering stability. You cannot infer such an expectation from previous behaviour. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6101> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
