On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:54 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] >> Anyway, if we're going to change policies around submitting code, I >> would much rather see peer review become a habit than adopt a tool >> like PQM. > > The part where I'm skeptical about such a policy is that there might > be a shortage of reviewers. What if a patch on Rietvield doesn't find > a reviewer for a month or so? Many patches in the tracker sit there > for years without any committer reviewing them. >
It would be a change in culture for us, that's for sure. The question becomes whether the drop in patch throughput is justified by an increase of patch quality and stability in the code? -Brett _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers