On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> How does that sounds? >>> >>> Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular >>> basis? >>> >>> Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald? >>> (the 2.6.1 release page claims that they are signed with Benjamin's >>> key, but no binary is even available. Before this gets fixed, I >>> think we need to agree on who is going to produce the binaries, and >>> using what schedule.) >>> >> >> What we probably should do is outline the steps in PEP 101 for >> building the various binaries. For instance I could cut OS X releases >> but I just don't know the exact steps are. > > For 2.5.x I used to following procedure. > > Requirements: > > * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x >
That requirement right there take me out for being able to to do the binary. -Brett _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
